It has been some time since I have waxed properly crabby about language use, so I thought I would reach into the archive and revisit an early post about words which are far too often misused and confused. Most subscribers will not have read this; to my very early subscribers, I hope you will not mind another look at this list.
We all know that language evolves, and that’s fine: it is a living entity. We might have different levels of ease with letting go of old friends and getting on board with new ones (I’ll admit, it took me a while to begrudgingly accept texted).
I’m referring to more than simple transgressions or typos. These are things we see and hear on an all-too-regular basis which have bona fide potential for harm through miscommunication, and are not just the personal grievances of finger-wagging persnickety grammar police who want to feel superior.
I cringe not only when I see and hear them, but also for the poor souls who have shown their unfortunate lack of time spent with books. It is this distance from the written word that renders them doubly ignorant: of their own lack of knowledge, and of their obliviousness to that condition. For these, I feel only empathy and compassion, along with the hope that they will become aware, learn, and grow.
However, those in positions of leadership, public office, media, and education who fail to meet even basic standards of literacy betray those they serve, dumb down our society, and embarrass themselves as well as their organizations—which often means the rest of us. Both of my foreign exchange students, one from Denmark and one from Thailand (which has a non-Roman alphabet to boot), had far better English skills by the age of fifteen—in their second languages—than the majority of American adults.
It is time to raise the bar.
When you encounter the kinds of egregious errors below—in what is, after all, a middle school level of fluency—I encourage you to email, write, text, or call those in the above types of roles and politely, respectfully, point out their errors, giving them the correct word, definition, and spelling.
This is not “grammar police” behavior (and technically it’s usage). It’s not arguing over a comma, or picking at the placement of a preposition or tsk-tsking at a split infinitive, all of which are often open to interpretation anyway. No, being in a position of authority and directing the “dispersal of funds” only brings into question why such a person has any control over funds at all.
The juvenile behavior and moronic statements I hear and read from far too many…ahem…representatives, make me certain that the language of legislation—remember they are writing our laws—is so far above their level of comprehension that it scares me stupid. Respectfully correcting mistakes means holding them to only a minimum degree of competence.
Frankly, those in positions of leadership and power need to be held to even higher standards by virtue of their influence on children, the public, and new English learners of all ages, as well as those they represent, lead, and educate. At a bare minimum, however, they should be held to the very basic standards of literacy.
Meanwhile, here are my bêtes noires:
accept / except
adieu / ado
adverse / averse
advice / advise
anecdote / antidote
appraise / apprise
ask / axe
assure / ensure / insure
bale / bail - contributed by
bated / baited
bazaar / bizarre
bear / bare
break / brake - contributed by
Calvary / cavalry
core / corps / corpse
council / counsel
county / country
defuse / diffuse
defiantly / definitely
desert / dessert
diseased / deceased
devise / device
disburse / disperse
discrete / discreet
due / do
elicit / illicit
exasperated / exacerbated
excerpt / expert / exert
forward / foreword
hanged / hung
home / hone
incidents / incidence
install / instill
interment / internment
lay / lie - contributed by
medal / metal / mettle
moot / mute
moral / morale
passed / past
peak / peek / pique
perk / perq
persecute / prosecute
personal / personnel
perspective / prospective
podium / lectern
pole / poll
pore / pour
precede / proceed
precedence / precedents / presidents
premier / premiere
principal / principle
prescribe / proscribe
quiet / quite
rack / wrack
rational / rationale
reign / rein / rain
role / roll
sense / scents / since
site / sight / cite
suit / suite
stationary / stationery
succeed / secede
tact / tack
tenet / tenant
than / then
throne / thrown
versus / verses
whether / weather / wether
woman / women
wretch / retch
yoke / yolk
What are your favorite frequently-confused examples? I am curious…but not curios. See you Friday for fun with Minced Metaphors!
Once again, thank you for popping in to the Verbihund Café!
Lay / lie. It’s not that hard. And if we have all decided that “among” no longer serves any purpose, let’s give it a roaring Norse funeral send off. If I see another Times or Post writer who says “between” 3 disparate items, I will kill that person.
The one that bugs me is break/brake. I've seen way too many examples of people writing about problems with their breaks squealing.